It is no good telling the bereaved mother that Christ still loves and cares for her if she has only been taught to think of Christ in terms of how he works on her own feelings and in her own experiences. She needs to be able to see that God is much greater than her experience of him; she needs to know that, whatever her current feelings of anguish and despair, God is trustworthy and loving; and she needs to know that assurance is not necessarily about emotional highs but about knowing that God is faithful even though the whole world appears to be falling apart around her. Such will only be possible if the theological environment in which she lives and worships teaches her to understand Christ above all in terms of his historical work of redemption for the people of God; and that will only come about when the emphasis in preaching focuses not on ourselves but on the Christ of the Bible. Setting Christ above all in the context of biblical history rather than our own experience will promote a truly high understanding of Christ as Redeemer, and one that will ultimately be of more use than the Christ of Emotional Therapy that would seem today to be the preferred alternative in many circles, itself the result in part of our natural human tendency to place our needs rather than God's mighty acts of salvation at the centre of our theology.Reformation: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow by Carl Trueman, Christian Focus Publications, 2011, pp. 122-123.
"She needs to be able to see that God is much greater than her experience of him"
This passage is so close to home. I was not a bereaved mother but a heartbroken wife wondering where God was when my husband walked out the door. I would never have owned it at the time, but God was a God of my experience. My degree of assurance was directly tied to my emotions, even though I wasn't outwardly a very emotional person. When I read the Word, every passage was taken allegorically such that the Bible was mainly about God talking to me about me rather than revealing Himself. After the separation, I combed the Word looking for passages that I would take out of context for any shred of hope that my marriage would be saved. I found testimonies on the Internet of marriages that were saved at the 11th hour or restored post-divorce and prayed that I would duplicate someone else's experience.
But the kindest thing that God did in my suffering was to turn my gaze away from my own suffering to His absolute sovereignty. This breakthrough in my understanding (doctrine) and the desire to learn more (theology) is what brought me out of despair. I began to see that God was trustworthy - not because of a happy ending, but because His word doesn't lie and His character doesn't change.
For those who would say that theology and doctrine are dry, dull, and impractical. I would respectfully disagree. The knowledge of God for Himself alone is life-changing and liberating.

Thank you for this testimony to the sufficiency and trustworthiness of our God. The knowledge of God for Himself alone is life-changing and liberating, yes and amen.
ReplyDeleteAmen Persis. I've observed that outward expressions of affection are not necessarily the mark of a true Christian. In fact, it often turns out that these are the ones who possess the least stability since their faith is based largely on emotions. And I am with you 100% -- the knowledge of God's sovereignty in salvation, and therefore over ALL circumstances put my spiritual feet on the solid and sure rock of God's Word.
ReplyDeleteSuch true words, Persis. I had a very similar experience with my own divorce.
ReplyDelete